The Accuracy And Reproducibility Of The KT1000 Knee Ligament Arthrometer

Dale M. Daniel, M.D. (1990)

The accuracy and reproducibility of the KT1000 has been reported by   a number of investigators.

Cadaveric Studies

The correlation between measurements of A-P displacement recorded by a skeletal pin motion and the KT1000 has been reported by Daniel (10) (Fig. 1) and Shoemaker (42).

The change in anterior displacement after ACL section has been reported by Burks (6) and Daniel (17) (Fig. 2).

Measurement Reproducibility

Satisfactory reproducibility testing with the KT1000 has been reported by Malcom (31) (Fig. 3), Highenboten (28), Steiner (45), Hanten (25), and Daniel (13). Forster (20) is the only reported study were the reproducibility was not satisfactory.



From the Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Kaiser Hospital, and the Division of Orthopedic Surgery, University of California, San Diego.
Arthrometer Measurements vs 
Actual Skeletal Displacements 
in Cadavers

Fig.1
Effect of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Section on Anterior Displacement (Frequency of Ant Displacement Increase)

Fig. 2
Anterior Drawer: Magnitude and
Side to Side Difference Variation

Fig.3 


The precision of A-P displacement measurements are dependent on a standardized method of placing the leg and securely stabilizing the patella in the femoral trochlea. With adequate patellar stabilization, tibial tubercle motion relative to the patella accurately reflects motion of the tibia relative to the femur. It is necessary to flex the knee 20 to 30 degrees in order to engage the patella in the femoral trochlea. In patients with patella alta or lateral tracking patella, the knee may need to be flexed to 40 degrees.

The patella is stabilized in the femoral trochlea by direct pressure which should be oriented to seat the patella (Fig. 4).

The patellar stabilization pressure must remain constant. Altering the patellar pressure may result in motion of the patellar sensor, especially in subjects with a joint effusion or patellar chondromalacia. The hand stabilizing the patella in the femoral trochlea should rest on the thigh and prevent the instrument from rotating during the test.

To facilitate patella stabilization, the femur should be positioned so the patella is facing up, or in slight external rotation. If there is excessive rotation, the thigh should be supported with a thigh strap (Fig. 5). The foot support should not be used to internally rotate the leg, but to simply support the feet.
The test variability between the KT1000 and the clinical examination or different testing systems has been reported (15, 23, 28, 40, 44, 45). Though the absolute displacement differences between devices vary, there is good correlation on side-to-side difference measurements with instruments that have a tibial tubercle and a patellar sensor pad.

It is important to establish the precision of a testing system prior to utilizing it in decision making. The manufacturer recommends monthly monitoring of the KT1000 instrument to confirm accuracy of the load-sensing handle and the displacement sensors. The important indicator of pathology is side-to-side difference. The same machine must be used on both sides to minimize the significance of small calibration errors in the machine itself. The crucial element in the testing process is to duplicate the testing technique on the second knee that was used on the first knee. Important points are:

  1. Muscle relaxation.
  2. Similar limb orientation.
  3. Similar Arthrometer placement on the leg in respect to the instrument marker at the joint line and instrument rotation in relation to the patella.
  4. Consistent patella pad pressure technique and establishing the testing reference position.
  5. Establishing the testing reference position.
  6. Similar speed and vector of force application.
The two greatest sources of measurement errors with the Arthrometer are lack of muscle relaxation and inability to stabilize the patellar sensor pad. Physicians, nurses, therapists and technicians who plan to do KT1000 testing should receive formal instruction and document their own test/retest reproducibility by testing a number of patients on different days.
 
 
 



 


 

Fig. 4The knee is supported in a flexed position to engage the patella in the femoral trochlea. In some patients the thigh support must be raised 3 to 6 more centimeters to provide sufficient knee flexion to engage the patella in the femoral trochlea. This may be done by placing a board under the thigh support. The thigh should be supported so the patella is facing up. Occasionally thigh strap is used to accomplish this task (Fig. 5). The examiner stabilizes the patella sensor with manual pressure. The stabilizing hand should rest against the lateral thigh and apply 2 to 5 pounds of pressure on the patella sensor pad. The hand position, patella sensor position and patella sensor pressure must remain constant throughout the test. Varying the pressure on the patella sensor pad and rotation of the pad is a common cause of measurement error.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


Table I
Normal A-P Displacement Measurements
Range Low High Mean St. Dev. 95% Cut-Off
Displacement (n = 240)
20 lb. Posterior 1 6 2.8 0.9 4.5
20 lb. Anterior 5 14.7 7.2 2.0 10
20 lb. Anterior-Posterior 5 18 10.0 2.4 12
Manual Maximum Anterior 4.5 15. 8.6 2.1 12
Quadriceps Active Displacement 2 12.5 5.7 1.8 9
Right Minus Left (n = 120)
20 lb. Posterior 0 2 0 0.7 1.0*
20 lb. Anterior  -0.2 -3.5 -2.0 1.0 2.0*
20 lb. Anterior-Posterior -4 4 0.2 0.9 2.5*
Manual Maximum Anterior -4 3 -0.3 1.1 2.0*
Quadriceps Active Displacement -3 2 -0.4 1.0 2.0*
* Right-left difference

Normal Displacement
Measurements in normal subjects have been reported by a number of investigators (3, 10, 11, 14, 16, 25, 28, 40). Tests at 30 degrees of flexion on 120 normal subjects is presented in Table I (13). The KT1000 has been used to document the effect of exercise on A-P displacement on normal subjects (7, 43).
ACL-Injured Patients
Measurements in unilateral ACL-injured patients have been reported to be diagnostic of an ACL disruption 70 to 95 per cent of the time (2, 3, 9, 10, 11, 13, 16, 20, 31, 40). With the exception of Forster (20) all investigators have reported that instrumented measurements were helpful in diagnosing and documenting an ACL disruption. Higher load displacement tests, the manual maximum and the 30-pound test are more diagnostic of an ACL disruption than a 20-pound displacement load (9, 13, 16). Less than 5 per cent of normal subjects will have a right-left difference on any KT1000 displacement test of 3 millimeters or greater, therefore in an injured patient I have used a right-left difference of 3 millimeters to be indicative of a cruciate ligament injury. The amount of displacement measured acutely after injury is predictive of late displacement (13, 19, 41). Correlation between displacement measurements and the patient’s level of instability has been reported (13, 24). Data from six centers is presented in Table II.


 
Table II
Unilateral Chronic ACL Disruption Injured Minus Normal
Displacement Difference Knee Flexion Angle 20-35 Degrees
Clinic Examination
Author
n.
Mean
³ 3.0
Test: 20 lb.
Anderson (2) 35 4.3 --
Bach (3) 153 -- 79%
KSD (a) 177 5.2 85%
Drez (b) 19 6.3 --
3M LAD (c)  297 6.1 89%
Sherman (40) 19 5.1 95%
Test: Manual Maximum
Bach 153 -- 72%
KSD 177 8.5 99%
3M LAD 297 7.8 96%
Test: Quadriceps Active
KSD 177 43.3 70%
3M LAD 258 4.4 76%
Examination Under Anesthesia
Prior to Reconstruction
Test: 20 lb.
KSD 223 5.6 87%
3M LAD 297 639 96%
Test: Manual Maximum
KSD 223 8.9 97%
3M LAD 297 8.9 99%
Examination Under Anesthesia After Reconstruction
Test: 20 lb. (I-N)
KSD 223 -1.4 5%
(a) Kaiser, San Diego
(b) Drez DJ, personal communication
(c) 3M Mulitcenter LAD study


The effect of functional knee braces on anterior tibial subluxation has been documented with the KTl000 (4, 5, 8, 12, 33, 34).
ACL Reconstruction Surgery
KT1000 measurements have been used to document satisfactory graft tensioning at the time of ACL surgery (12, 13, 15) and to monitor A-P displacement during the early rehabilitation program (35, 39). Numerous authors used KT1000 measurements as a part of their followup documentation system (1, 15, 18, 22, 26, 27, 29, 30, 32, 38, 46, 47, 49). My preference is to present followup data as presented in Table III.


 
Table III
KT1000 Anterior Displacement Millimeters Injured Minus Normal
SDK79
Pre-Repair Post-Repair
Without 
Anesthesia
With 
Anesthesia
With 
Anesthesia
Without 
Anesthesia
20 Pound
N 78 77 76 79
<3  3 (4%) 9 (12%) 72 (95%) 45 (57%)
3 to 5 22 (28%) 18 (23%) 3 (4%) 26 (33%)
5.5 to 7.5 33 (42%) 25 (33%) 1 (1%) 7 (9%)
>7.5 20 (25%) 25 (32%) 0 1 (1%)
Mean 6.3 mm 63 mm 0.0 mm 2.3 mm
Manual Maximum
N 77 77 59 79
<3 0 2 (3%) 52 (88%) 20 (25%)
3 to 5.5 5 (7%) 4 (5%) 7 (12%) 29 (37%)
5.5 to 7.5 19 (25%) 20 (26%) 0 23 (29%)
8 to 10 18 (23%) 15 (20%) 0 4 (5%)
>10 35 (45%) 36 (47%) 0 3 (4%)
Mean 9.6 mm 9.6 mm -1.1 mm 4.0 mm
Quadriceps Active
N 77 79
<3 15 (20%) 44 (56%)
3 to 5 26 (35%) 23 (29%)
5.5 to 7.5 20 (27%) 9 (11%)
>7.5 14 (18%) 3 (4%)
Mean 4.9 mm 2.3 mm

PCL-Injured Patient

Measurements in the PCL-injured patient have been reported (11, 13, 14, 21, 36, 37, 48). The key to measurement of posterior tibial subluxation is to reference the measurements to the quadriceps active position at the quadriceps neutral angle (Fig. 6).
Fig.6



 

Reference List

1. Anderson AF, Lipscomb AB: Analysis of rehabilitation techniques after anterior cruciate reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 17:154-160, 1989.
2. Anderson AF, Lipscomb AB: Preoperative instrumented testing of anterior and posterior knee laxity. Am J Sports Med. 17:387-392, 1989.
3. Bach BR, Flynn W, Warren RF, Kroll M, Wickiewicz TL: KT1000 evaluation of normal, acute, and chronic anterior cruciate ligament knees introduction. Orthop Transactions. II:321-322, 1987.
4. Beck C, Drez D JR, Young J, Cannon WD Jr, Stone ML: Instrumented testing of functional knee braces. Am J Sports Med. 14:254-256.
5. Branch T, Hunter R, Reynolds P: Controlling anterior tibial displacement under static load: a comparison of two braces. Orthopedics. 9:1249-1252, 1986.
6. Burks R, Daniel D, Losse G: The effect of continuous passive motion on anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction stability. Am J Sports Med. 12:323-327, 1984.
7. Chandler TJ, Wilson GD, Stone MH: The effect of the squat exercise on knee stability. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 21:299-303, 1988.
8. Cook FF, Tibone JE, Redferen FC: A dynamic analysis of a functional brace for anterior cruciate ligament insufficiency. Am J Sports Med. 17:519-524, 1989.
9. Dahlstedt LJ, Dalen N: Knee laxity in cruciate ligament injury. Value of examination under anesthesia. Acta Orthop Scand. 60:181-184, 1989.
10. Daniel DM, Malcom LL, Losse G, Stone ML, Sachs R, Burks R: Instrumented measurement of anterior laxity of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg. 67-A:720-726, 1985.
11. Daniel DM, Stone ML: Diagnosis of knee ligament injury: tests and measurements of joint laxity. In: Feagin JA, ed. The Crucial Ligaments. New York: Churchill Livingstone Inc., 287-300, 1988.
12. Daniel DM, Stone ML: Ch. 3 – Case Studies. In: Daniel DM, Akeson WA, O’Connor JJ: Knee Ligaments: Structure, Function, Injury, and Repair. New York: Raven Press, 31-5; 1990.
13. Daniel DM, Stone ML: Ch. 24 – KT1000 Anterior-posterior displacement measurements. In: Daniel DM, Akeson WA, O’Connor JJ, eds.: Knee Ligaments; Structure, Function, Injury, and Repair. New York: Raven Press, 427-447, 1990.
14. Daniel DM, Stone ML, Barnett P, Sachs R: Use of the quadriceps active test to diagnose posterior cruciate ligament disruption and measure posterior laxity of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg. 70-A:386-391, 1988.
15. Daniel DM, Stone ML, Riehl B: Ch. 29 – Ligament surgery: the evaluation of results. In: Daniel DM, Akeson WA, O’Connor JJ, eds. Knee Ligaments: Structure, Function, Injury, and Repair. New York: Raven Press, 521-534, 1990.
16. Daniel DM, Stone ML, Sachs R, Malcom LL: Instrumented measurement of anterior knee laxity in patients with acute anterior cruciate ligament disruption. Am J Sports Med. 13:401-407, 1985.
17.  Daniel DM, Teitge RA, Grana WA, Brody DM: Knee and leg: soft tissue trauma. Orthopedic Knowledge Update ll. Chapter 36, 1990.
18.  Daniel DM, Woodard EP, Losse GM, Stone ML: The marshall/macintosh anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with the kennedy ligament augmentation device: report of the United States clinical trials. In: Friedman JJ, Ferkel RD, eds. Prosthetic Ligament Reconstruction of the Knee. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders Company, 71-78, 1988.
19. Foreman K,  Daniel DM, Stone ML: Determining the prognosis of partial tears of the ACL by anterior displacement measurements. (Annual meeting AOSSM, Palm Desert, June 1988).
20. Forster IW, Warren-Smith CD, Tew M: Is the KT1000 ligament arthrometer reliable? J Bone Joint Surg. 71-B:843-847, 1989.
21. Fowler PJ, Messieh SS: Isolated posterior cruciate ligament injuries in athletes. Am J Sports Med. 15:553-557, 1987.
22. Glousman R, Shields C, Kerlan R, Jobe F, Lombardo S, Yocum L, Tibone J, Gambardella R: Gore-tex prosthetic ligament in anterior cruciate deficient knees. Am J Sports Med. 16:321-326, 1988.
23. Gurtler RA, Stine R, Torg JS: Lachman test evaluated. Clin Orthop. 216:141-150, 1987.
24. Hanley ST, Warren RF: Arthroscopic meniscectomy in the anterior cruciate ligament deficient knee. J Arthroscopie and Related Surgery, 3:59-65, 1987.
25. Hanten WP, Pace MC: Reliability of measuring anterior laxity of the knee joint using a knee ligament arthrometer. Phys Ther. 67:357-359, 1987.
26. Harter RA, Ostering LR, Singer KM: Instrumented lachman tests for the evaluation of anterior laxity after reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg. 71-A:975-983, 1989.
27. Higgins RW, Steadman JR: Anterior cruciate ligament repairs in world class skiers. Am J Sports Med. 15:439-447, 1987.
28. Highenboten CL, Jackson A, Meske NB: Genucom, KT1000, and stryker knee laxity measuring device comparisons. Am J Sports Med. 17:743-746, 1989.
29. Indelicato PA, Pascale MS, Huegel MO: Early experience with the gore-tex polytetrafluoroethylene anterior cruciate ligament prosthesis. Am J Sports Med. 17:55-62, 1989.
30. Lipscomb AB, Anderson AF: Tears of the anterior cruciate in adolescents. J Bone Joint Surg. 68-A:19-28, 1986.
31. Malcom LL,  Daniel DM, Stone ML, Sachs R: The measurement of anterior knee laxity after ACL reconstructive surgery. Clin Orthop. 196:35-41, 1985.
32. McCarroll JR, Rettig AC, Shelbourne KD: Anterior cruciate ligament injuries in the young athlete with open physes. Am J Sports Med. 16:44-47, 1988.
33. Mishra DK, Daniel DM, Stone ML: The use of functional knee braces in the control of pathologic anterior knee laxity. Clin Orthop. 241:213-220, 1989.
34. Mortenseon W, Foreman K, Focht L, Daniel D, Biden E: An in vitro study of functional orthoses in the ACL-disrupted knee. Trans Orthop Res Soc. 13:520, 1988.
35. Noyes FR, Mangine RE, Barber S: Early knee motion after open and arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 15:149-160, 1987.
36. Parolie JM, Bergfeld JA: Long-term results of nonoperative treatment of isolated posterior cruciate ligament injuries in the athlete. Am J Sports Med. 14:35-38, 1986.
37. Roth JH, Bray RC, Best TM, Cunning LA, Jacobson RP: Posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction by transfer of the medial gastrocnemius tendon. Am J Sports Med. 16:21-28, 1988.
38. Roth JH, Kennedy JC, Lockstadt H, McCalum CL, Cunning LA: Polypropylene braid augmented and nonaugmented intraarticular anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 13:321-336, 1985.
39. Sachs RA, Reznik A, Daneil DM, Stone ML: Ch. 28 – Complications of knee ligament surgery. In: Daniel DM, Akeson WA, O ’Connor JJ, eds. Knee Ligaments: Structure, Function, Injury, and Repair. New York: Raven Press, 505-520, 1990.
40. Sherman OH, Markolf KL, Ferkel RD: Measurements of anterior laxity in normal and anterior cruciate absent knees with two instrumented test devices. Clin Orthop. 215:156-161, 1987.
41. Shields CL, Silva I, Yee L, Brewster C: Evaluation of residual instability after arthroscopic meniscectomy in anterior cruciate deficient knees. Am J Sports Med. 15:129-131, 1987.
42. Shoemaker SC, Harris SL, Adams DJ,  Daniel DM, Woo SL-Y: The quadriceps-anterior cruciate ligament interaction: an in vitro kinematic study of the vertically loaded quadriceps stabilized knee. 1990. (Submitted for publication).
43. Skinner HB, Wyatt MP, Stone ML: Exercise-related knee joint laxity. Am J Sports Med. 14:30-34, 1986.
44. Somerlath C, Gilouist J, et al: International Knee Congress, Rome, 1989.
45. Steiner M, et al.: Knee laxity testing: comparison of instrumented devices and the clinical examination, presented at the AAOS, Las Vegas, 1989.
46. Straub T, Hunter R E: Acute anterior cruciate ligament repair. Clin Orthop. 227:238-250, 1988.
47. Tibone JE, Antich TJ: A biomechanical analysis of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with the patellar tendon – a two-year followup. Am J Sports Med. 16:332-335, 1988.
48. Torg JS, Barton TM, Pavlov H, Stine R: Natural history of the posterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee. Clin Orthop. 246:208-216, 1989.
49. Wainer RA, Clarke TJ, Poehling GG: Arthroscopic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament using allograft tendon. Arthroscopy. 4:199-205, 1988.