The Accuracy And Reproducibility Of The KT1000 Knee Ligament Arthrometer
Dale M. Daniel, M.D. (1990)
The accuracy and reproducibility of the KT1000 has been reported by
a number of investigators.
Cadaveric Studies
The correlation between measurements of A-P displacement recorded by
a skeletal pin motion and the KT1000 has been reported by Daniel (10) (Fig.
1) and Shoemaker (42).
The change in anterior displacement after ACL section has been reported
by Burks (6) and Daniel (17) (Fig. 2).
Measurement Reproducibility
Satisfactory reproducibility testing with the KT1000 has been reported
by Malcom (31) (Fig. 3), Highenboten (28), Steiner
(45), Hanten (25), and Daniel (13). Forster (20) is the only reported study
were the reproducibility was not satisfactory.
From the Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Kaiser
Hospital, and the Division of Orthopedic Surgery, University of California,
San Diego.
The precision of A-P displacement measurements are dependent on a standardized
method of placing the leg and securely stabilizing the patella in the femoral
trochlea. With adequate patellar stabilization, tibial tubercle motion
relative to the patella accurately reflects motion of the tibia relative
to the femur. It is necessary to flex the knee 20 to 30 degrees in order
to engage the patella in the femoral trochlea. In patients with patella
alta or lateral tracking patella, the knee may need to be flexed to 40
degrees.
The patella is stabilized in the femoral trochlea by direct pressure
which should be oriented to seat the patella (Fig. 4).
The patellar stabilization pressure must remain constant. Altering the
patellar pressure may result in motion of the patellar sensor, especially
in subjects with a joint effusion or patellar chondromalacia. The hand
stabilizing the patella in the femoral trochlea should rest on the thigh
and prevent the instrument from rotating during the test.
To facilitate patella stabilization, the femur should be positioned
so the patella is facing up, or in slight external rotation. If there is
excessive rotation, the thigh should be supported with a thigh strap (Fig.
5). The foot support should not be used to internally rotate the leg,
but to simply support the feet.
The test variability between the KT1000 and the clinical examination
or different testing systems has been reported (15, 23, 28, 40, 44, 45).
Though the absolute displacement differences between devices vary, there
is good correlation on side-to-side difference measurements with instruments
that have a tibial tubercle and a patellar sensor pad.
It is important to establish the precision of a testing system prior
to utilizing it in decision making. The manufacturer recommends monthly
monitoring of the KT1000 instrument to confirm accuracy of the load-sensing
handle and the displacement sensors. The important indicator of pathology
is side-to-side difference. The same machine must be used on both sides
to minimize the significance of small calibration errors in the machine
itself. The crucial element in the testing process is to duplicate the
testing technique on the second knee that was used on the first knee. Important
points are:
-
Muscle relaxation.
-
Similar limb orientation.
-
Similar Arthrometer placement on the leg in respect to the instrument marker
at the joint line and instrument rotation in relation to the patella.
-
Consistent patella pad pressure technique and establishing the testing
reference position.
-
Establishing the testing reference position.
-
Similar speed and vector of force application.
The two greatest
sources of measurement errors with the Arthrometer are lack of muscle relaxation
and inability to stabilize the patellar sensor pad. Physicians, nurses,
therapists and technicians who plan to do KT1000 testing should receive
formal instruction and document their own test/retest reproducibility by
testing a number of patients on different days.
Fig. 4 — The knee is supported in a flexed position
to engage the patella in the femoral trochlea. In some patients the thigh
support must be raised 3 to 6 more centimeters to provide sufficient knee
flexion to engage the patella in the femoral trochlea. This may be done
by placing a board under the thigh support. The thigh should be supported
so the patella is facing up. Occasionally thigh strap is used to accomplish
this task (Fig. 5). The examiner stabilizes the patella
sensor with manual pressure. The stabilizing hand should rest against the
lateral thigh and apply 2 to 5 pounds of pressure on the patella sensor
pad. The hand position, patella sensor position and patella sensor pressure
must remain constant throughout the test. Varying the pressure on the patella
sensor pad and rotation of the pad is a common cause of measurement error.
Table I
Normal A-P Displacement Measurements
| Range |
Low |
High |
Mean |
St. Dev. |
95% Cut-Off |
| Displacement (n = 240) |
|
|
|
|
|
| 20 lb. Posterior |
1 |
6 |
2.8 |
0.9 |
4.5 |
| 20 lb. Anterior |
5 |
14.7 |
7.2 |
2.0 |
10 |
| 20 lb. Anterior-Posterior |
5 |
18 |
10.0 |
2.4 |
12 |
| Manual Maximum Anterior |
4.5 |
15. |
8.6 |
2.1 |
12 |
| Quadriceps Active Displacement |
2 |
12.5 |
5.7 |
1.8 |
9 |
| Right Minus Left (n = 120) |
|
|
|
|
|
| 20 lb. Posterior |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0.7 |
1.0* |
| 20 lb. Anterior |
-0.2 |
-3.5 |
-2.0 |
1.0 |
2.0* |
| 20 lb. Anterior-Posterior |
-4 |
4 |
0.2 |
0.9 |
2.5* |
| Manual Maximum Anterior |
-4 |
3 |
-0.3 |
1.1 |
2.0* |
| Quadriceps Active Displacement |
-3 |
2 |
-0.4 |
1.0 |
2.0* |
* Right-left difference
Normal Displacement
Measurements in normal subjects have been reported by a number of investigators
(3, 10, 11, 14, 16, 25, 28, 40). Tests at 30 degrees of flexion on 120
normal subjects is presented in Table I (13). The
KT1000 has been used to document the effect of exercise on A-P displacement
on normal subjects (7, 43).
ACL-Injured Patients
Measurements in unilateral ACL-injured patients have been reported to be
diagnostic of an ACL disruption 70 to 95 per cent of the time (2, 3, 9,
10, 11, 13, 16, 20, 31, 40). With the exception of Forster (20) all investigators
have reported that instrumented measurements were helpful in diagnosing
and documenting an ACL disruption. Higher load displacement tests, the
manual maximum and the 30-pound test are more diagnostic of an ACL disruption
than a 20-pound displacement load (9, 13, 16). Less than 5 per cent of
normal subjects will have a right-left difference on any KT1000 displacement
test of 3 millimeters or greater, therefore in an injured patient I have
used a right-left difference of 3 millimeters to be indicative of a cruciate
ligament injury. The amount of displacement measured acutely after injury
is predictive of late displacement (13, 19, 41). Correlation between displacement
measurements and the patient’s level of instability has been reported (13,
24). Data from six centers is presented in Table II.
Table II
Unilateral Chronic ACL Disruption Injured Minus Normal
Displacement Difference Knee Flexion Angle 20-35 Degrees
Clinic Examination
Author
|
n.
|
Mean
|
³ 3.0
|
| Test: 20 lb. |
|
|
|
| Anderson (2) |
35 |
4.3 |
-- |
| Bach (3) |
153 |
-- |
79% |
| KSD (a) |
177 |
5.2 |
85% |
| Drez (b) |
19 |
6.3 |
-- |
| 3M LAD (c) |
297 |
6.1 |
89% |
| Sherman (40) |
19 |
5.1 |
95% |
| Test: Manual Maximum |
|
|
|
| Bach |
153 |
-- |
72% |
| KSD |
177 |
8.5 |
99% |
| 3M LAD |
297 |
7.8 |
96% |
| Test: Quadriceps Active |
|
|
|
| KSD |
177 |
43.3 |
70% |
| 3M LAD |
258 |
4.4 |
76% |
Examination Under Anesthesia
Prior to Reconstruction |
|
|
|
| Test: 20 lb. |
|
|
|
| KSD |
223 |
5.6 |
87% |
| 3M LAD |
297 |
639 |
96% |
| Test: Manual Maximum |
|
|
|
| KSD |
223 |
8.9 |
97% |
| 3M LAD |
297 |
8.9 |
99% |
| Examination Under Anesthesia After Reconstruction |
|
|
|
| Test: 20 lb. (I-N) |
|
|
|
| KSD |
223 |
-1.4 |
5% |
(a) Kaiser, San Diego
(b) Drez DJ, personal communication
(c) 3M Mulitcenter LAD study
The effect of functional knee braces on anterior tibial subluxation
has been documented with the KTl000 (4, 5, 8, 12, 33, 34).
ACL Reconstruction Surgery
KT1000 measurements have been used to document satisfactory graft tensioning
at the time of ACL surgery (12, 13, 15) and to monitor A-P displacement
during the early rehabilitation program (35, 39). Numerous authors used
KT1000 measurements as a part of their followup documentation system (1,
15, 18, 22, 26, 27, 29, 30, 32, 38, 46, 47, 49). My preference is to present
followup data as presented in Table III.
Table III
KT1000 Anterior Displacement Millimeters Injured Minus
Normal
SDK79
|
Pre-Repair |
|
Post-Repair |
|
|
Without
Anesthesia |
With
Anesthesia |
With
Anesthesia |
Without
Anesthesia |
| 20 Pound |
|
|
|
|
| N |
78 |
77 |
76 |
79 |
| <3 |
3 (4%) |
9 (12%) |
72 (95%) |
45 (57%) |
| 3 to 5 |
22 (28%) |
18 (23%) |
3 (4%) |
26 (33%) |
| 5.5 to 7.5 |
33 (42%) |
25 (33%) |
1 (1%) |
7 (9%) |
| >7.5 |
20 (25%) |
25 (32%) |
0 |
1 (1%) |
| Mean |
6.3 mm |
63 mm |
0.0 mm |
2.3 mm |
| Manual Maximum |
|
|
|
|
| N |
77 |
77 |
59 |
79 |
| <3 |
0 |
2 (3%) |
52 (88%) |
20 (25%) |
| 3 to 5.5 |
5 (7%) |
4 (5%) |
7 (12%) |
29 (37%) |
| 5.5 to 7.5 |
19 (25%) |
20 (26%) |
0 |
23 (29%) |
| 8 to 10 |
18 (23%) |
15 (20%) |
0 |
4 (5%) |
| >10 |
35 (45%) |
36 (47%) |
0 |
3 (4%) |
| Mean |
9.6 mm |
9.6 mm |
-1.1 mm |
4.0 mm |
| Quadriceps Active |
|
|
|
|
| N |
77 |
|
|
79 |
| <3 |
15 (20%) |
|
|
44 (56%) |
| 3 to 5 |
26 (35%) |
|
|
23 (29%) |
| 5.5 to 7.5 |
20 (27%) |
|
|
9 (11%) |
| >7.5 |
14 (18%) |
|
|
3 (4%) |
| Mean |
4.9 mm |
|
|
2.3 mm |
PCL-Injured Patient
Measurements in the PCL-injured patient have been reported (11, 13,
14, 21, 36, 37, 48). The key to measurement of posterior tibial subluxation
is to reference the measurements to the quadriceps active position at the
quadriceps neutral angle (Fig. 6).
Fig.6
Reference List
1. Anderson AF, Lipscomb AB: Analysis of rehabilitation techniques after
anterior cruciate reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 17:154-160, 1989.
2. Anderson AF, Lipscomb AB: Preoperative instrumented testing of anterior
and posterior knee laxity. Am J Sports Med. 17:387-392, 1989.
3. Bach BR, Flynn W, Warren RF, Kroll M, Wickiewicz TL: KT1000 evaluation
of normal, acute, and chronic anterior cruciate ligament knees introduction.
Orthop Transactions. II:321-322, 1987.
4. Beck C, Drez D JR, Young J, Cannon WD Jr, Stone ML: Instrumented
testing of functional knee braces. Am J Sports Med. 14:254-256.
5. Branch T, Hunter R, Reynolds P: Controlling anterior tibial displacement
under static load: a comparison of two braces. Orthopedics. 9:1249-1252,
1986.
6. Burks R, Daniel D, Losse G: The effect of continuous passive motion
on anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction stability. Am J Sports Med.
12:323-327, 1984.
7. Chandler TJ, Wilson GD, Stone MH: The effect of the squat exercise
on knee stability. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 21:299-303,
1988.
8. Cook FF, Tibone JE, Redferen FC: A dynamic analysis of a functional
brace for anterior cruciate ligament insufficiency. Am J Sports Med. 17:519-524,
1989.
9. Dahlstedt LJ, Dalen N: Knee laxity in cruciate ligament injury.
Value of examination under anesthesia. Acta Orthop Scand. 60:181-184, 1989.
10. Daniel DM, Malcom LL, Losse G, Stone ML, Sachs R, Burks R: Instrumented
measurement of anterior laxity of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg. 67-A:720-726,
1985.
11. Daniel DM, Stone ML: Diagnosis of knee ligament injury: tests and
measurements of joint laxity. In: Feagin JA, ed. The Crucial Ligaments.
New York: Churchill Livingstone Inc., 287-300, 1988.
12. Daniel DM, Stone ML: Ch. 3 – Case Studies. In: Daniel DM, Akeson
WA, O’Connor JJ: Knee Ligaments: Structure, Function, Injury, and Repair.
New York: Raven Press, 31-5; 1990.
13. Daniel DM, Stone ML: Ch. 24 – KT1000 Anterior-posterior displacement
measurements. In: Daniel DM, Akeson WA, O’Connor JJ, eds.: Knee Ligaments;
Structure, Function, Injury, and Repair. New York: Raven Press, 427-447,
1990.
14. Daniel DM, Stone ML, Barnett P, Sachs R: Use of the quadriceps
active test to diagnose posterior cruciate ligament disruption and measure
posterior laxity of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg. 70-A:386-391, 1988.
15. Daniel DM, Stone ML, Riehl B: Ch. 29 – Ligament surgery: the evaluation
of results. In: Daniel DM, Akeson WA, O’Connor JJ, eds. Knee Ligaments:
Structure, Function, Injury, and Repair. New York: Raven Press, 521-534,
1990.
16. Daniel DM, Stone ML, Sachs R, Malcom LL: Instrumented measurement
of anterior knee laxity in patients with acute anterior cruciate ligament
disruption. Am J Sports Med. 13:401-407, 1985.
17. Daniel DM, Teitge RA, Grana WA, Brody DM: Knee and leg: soft
tissue trauma. Orthopedic Knowledge Update ll. Chapter 36, 1990.
18. Daniel DM, Woodard EP, Losse GM, Stone ML: The marshall/macintosh
anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with the kennedy ligament augmentation
device: report of the United States clinical trials. In: Friedman JJ, Ferkel
RD, eds. Prosthetic Ligament Reconstruction of the Knee. Philadelphia:
W. B. Saunders Company, 71-78, 1988.
19. Foreman K, Daniel DM, Stone ML: Determining the prognosis
of partial tears of the ACL by anterior displacement measurements. (Annual
meeting AOSSM, Palm Desert, June 1988).
20. Forster IW, Warren-Smith CD, Tew M: Is the KT1000 ligament arthrometer
reliable? J Bone Joint Surg. 71-B:843-847, 1989.
21. Fowler PJ, Messieh SS: Isolated posterior cruciate ligament injuries
in athletes. Am J Sports Med. 15:553-557, 1987.
22. Glousman R, Shields C, Kerlan R, Jobe F, Lombardo S, Yocum L, Tibone
J, Gambardella R: Gore-tex prosthetic ligament in anterior cruciate deficient
knees. Am J Sports Med. 16:321-326, 1988.
23. Gurtler RA, Stine R, Torg JS: Lachman test evaluated. Clin Orthop.
216:141-150, 1987.
24. Hanley ST, Warren RF: Arthroscopic meniscectomy in the anterior
cruciate ligament deficient knee. J Arthroscopie and Related Surgery, 3:59-65,
1987.
25. Hanten WP, Pace MC: Reliability of measuring anterior laxity of
the knee joint using a knee ligament arthrometer. Phys Ther. 67:357-359,
1987.
26. Harter RA, Ostering LR, Singer KM: Instrumented lachman tests for
the evaluation of anterior laxity after reconstruction of the anterior
cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg. 71-A:975-983, 1989.
27. Higgins RW, Steadman JR: Anterior cruciate ligament repairs in
world class skiers. Am J Sports Med. 15:439-447, 1987.
28. Highenboten CL, Jackson A, Meske NB: Genucom, KT1000, and stryker
knee laxity measuring device comparisons. Am J Sports Med. 17:743-746,
1989.
29. Indelicato PA, Pascale MS, Huegel MO: Early experience with the
gore-tex polytetrafluoroethylene anterior cruciate ligament prosthesis.
Am J Sports Med. 17:55-62, 1989.
30. Lipscomb AB, Anderson AF: Tears of the anterior cruciate in adolescents.
J Bone Joint Surg. 68-A:19-28, 1986.
31. Malcom LL, Daniel DM, Stone ML, Sachs R: The measurement
of anterior knee laxity after ACL reconstructive surgery. Clin Orthop.
196:35-41, 1985.
32. McCarroll JR, Rettig AC, Shelbourne KD: Anterior cruciate ligament
injuries in the young athlete with open physes. Am J Sports Med. 16:44-47,
1988.
33. Mishra DK, Daniel DM, Stone ML: The use of functional knee braces
in the control of pathologic anterior knee laxity. Clin Orthop. 241:213-220,
1989.
34. Mortenseon W, Foreman K, Focht L, Daniel D, Biden E: An in vitro
study of functional orthoses in the ACL-disrupted knee. Trans Orthop Res
Soc. 13:520, 1988.
35. Noyes FR, Mangine RE, Barber S: Early knee motion after open and
arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med.
15:149-160, 1987.
36. Parolie JM, Bergfeld JA: Long-term results of nonoperative treatment
of isolated posterior cruciate ligament injuries in the athlete. Am J Sports
Med. 14:35-38, 1986.
37. Roth JH, Bray RC, Best TM, Cunning LA, Jacobson RP: Posterior cruciate
ligament reconstruction by transfer of the medial gastrocnemius tendon.
Am J Sports Med. 16:21-28, 1988.
38. Roth JH, Kennedy JC, Lockstadt H, McCalum CL, Cunning LA: Polypropylene
braid augmented and nonaugmented intraarticular anterior cruciate ligament
reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 13:321-336, 1985.
39. Sachs RA, Reznik A, Daneil DM, Stone ML: Ch. 28 – Complications
of knee ligament surgery. In: Daniel DM, Akeson WA, O ’Connor JJ, eds.
Knee Ligaments: Structure, Function, Injury, and Repair. New York: Raven
Press, 505-520, 1990.
40. Sherman OH, Markolf KL, Ferkel RD: Measurements of anterior laxity
in normal and anterior cruciate absent knees with two instrumented test
devices. Clin Orthop. 215:156-161, 1987.
41. Shields CL, Silva I, Yee L, Brewster C: Evaluation of residual
instability after arthroscopic meniscectomy in anterior cruciate deficient
knees. Am J Sports Med. 15:129-131, 1987.
42. Shoemaker SC, Harris SL, Adams DJ, Daniel DM, Woo SL-Y: The
quadriceps-anterior cruciate ligament interaction: an in vitro kinematic
study of the vertically loaded quadriceps stabilized knee. 1990. (Submitted
for publication).
43. Skinner HB, Wyatt MP, Stone ML: Exercise-related knee joint laxity.
Am J Sports Med. 14:30-34, 1986.
44. Somerlath C, Gilouist J, et al: International Knee Congress, Rome,
1989.
45. Steiner M, et al.: Knee laxity testing: comparison of instrumented
devices and the clinical examination, presented at the AAOS, Las Vegas,
1989.
46. Straub T, Hunter R E: Acute anterior cruciate ligament repair.
Clin Orthop. 227:238-250, 1988.
47. Tibone JE, Antich TJ: A biomechanical analysis of anterior cruciate
ligament reconstruction with the patellar tendon – a two-year followup.
Am J Sports Med. 16:332-335, 1988.
48. Torg JS, Barton TM, Pavlov H, Stine R: Natural history of the posterior
cruciate ligament-deficient knee. Clin Orthop. 246:208-216, 1989.
49. Wainer RA, Clarke TJ, Poehling GG: Arthroscopic reconstruction
of the anterior cruciate ligament using allograft tendon. Arthroscopy.
4:199-205, 1988.